Michigan V Epa Mats

Epa centers on the epa s first limits on mercury arsenic and acid gases emitted by coal fired power plants known as mercury and air toxics mats.

Michigan v epa mats. Commentators have downplayed epa s loss in michigan stressing that because the court declined to vacate epa s regulation its decision would not preclude the rule from eventually going into effect. Rather it required epa to review and rewrite it in a manner that took costs into consideration at the. The court remanded three consolidated cases referred to as michigan v. Mats rules declared invalid in michigan v.

Environmental protection agency 576 u s. See e g dietrich hoefner mats is dead long live mats the michigan v. Schedule upcoming covid 19 webinars online programs guidance covid 19 and force majeure considerations. The court did not strike down the mats rule.

Even if the appeals court vacates the mats rule it will make little difference for power companies that have already shut down coal fired power plants to comply with the rule. The supreme court of the united states blog. The environmental protection agency interpreted 42 u s c. 2015 is a landmark united states supreme court case in which the court analyzed whether the environmental protection agency must consider costs when deciding to regulate rather than later in the process of issuing the regulation.

Circuit court of appeals on june 19 2020 23 advocacy groups represented by earthjustice sued the epa and asked the court to overturn the current administration s updated benefit cost analysis bca for limits on coal fired power plants mercury emissions. Circuit where the mats rule will be reconsidered. Hot read latest covid 19 guidance all aspects. In a petition filed in the d c.

Writing for a 5 4 majority justice antonin scalia held that the epa must consider costs and that it interpreted the clean air act unreasonably when it determined that it did not need to consider costs. 7412 n 1 a of the clean air act which requires the agency to regulate power plants when appropriate and necessary unreasonably when it refused to consider cost when making that decision. Epa to the d c. The case michigan v.

The existing mercury and air toxics standards mats regulations took.